Well...there'll be a few changes (additions) to the channel:
And I released song no. 10
Working on the next releases so blogging will continue to be paused. If there's anybody out there wanting more blogs - let me know. Otherwise I'll focus on the videos...
I wanted to do a blog about EQing and then
noticed that I didn’t explain my approach to mixing so far. And that would
leave you with my tips for using EQs without knowing why I do use them in this
way. So my mixing philosophy boils down to this:
Keep it as natural as possible but do whatever
necessary to make it sound good to your ears.
This leads to several consequences.
1. My mixes will never sound as modern as most
of the others.
This is pretty obvious. Modern mixes sound
everything but natural and are pushed to the max in terms of usage of limiters
especially the releases of mainstream artists or the big players of some
genres. Of course this doesn’t apply to every major release…but the ‘plastic
sound’ as I tend to call it is a standard at the moment. A standard I chose to
avoid for matters of taste. I know that some of my songs would profit from an
overly processed sound (Calling The X for example) but I prefer to keep
learning how to achieve a fat but also warm sound that keeps the character of
the originally recorded tracks. It seems that gluing the tracks together is a
little bit more complicated this way but I will keep on learning and improving.
2. My mixes will never have a constant volume.
If there is a more quiet part in a song I won’t
use the tricks of modern loudness to eliminate the overall dynamic of it. What
you might have noticed is that I am very cautious when it comes to compression
so far and that’s something I am working on. Controlling the dynamics on track
level so that I don’t need much compression on the sum. I think it’s becoming better.
Compression works a little counterintuitive so that I think most of the people
will struggle a little with that when beginning to mix music.
3. Very few effects.
Well…I had a POD XT Pro, POD X3 Live, POD HD
and a Vetta II Combo for years and used all the effects extremely rarely. I
like effects when just fiddling around but not really in a finished song. A
little chorus on an arpeggio here and there and the almighty duo of reverb and
delay. But that’s it. Bit crusher, phaser, flanger, ring modulators…nice to play
with but nothing more to me so far. We’ll see…I am not against them by default
(although ‘natural’ seems to suggest no effects) but it’s basically just not my
style.
4. I don’t care about competitive loudness.
Seriously. I just don’t care. I don’t think it’ll
ever have to compete on airplay so I can just keep it at a normal level.
5. You wouldn’t normally…too bad.
You wouldn’t pan the drums from the drummer’s
point of view – I do because it sounds and feels right to me. One of the most
important things I took away from reading and watching interviews with well-known
mixing engineers: they really don’t care about things like ‘normal’ or ‘regularly’.
They are called if someone wants their style of mixing applied. Try out their
tricks and tips, try out the standards but be honest with yourself and ‘mix it
your way’ if that’s what you want the music to sound like.
6. But your mixes sound really cheap so far.
What a surprise I am still a beginner. I am not
even able to achieve the things I want to but that’s part of the whole learning
process. And instead of ruining other people’s hard work I am practicing with
my own and will be able to easily remix everything later on.
Well this was a shorter one as I am busy
getting two tracks out to you this month. And I am pretty sure that only few
will like both songs. And owls won't like either of them.
First
of all: critiques, reviews, feedback – whatever you want to call it - is
important. It’s what helps you improving and keeps you moving on. Ideally.
In
today’s world it’s a little more complex. Earlier in the history of mankind you
weren’t able to learn about the opinions of the masses and you had to rely on
magazines or shows. I’ll ignore fan mail and threatening letters for obvious
reasons. Nowadays everyone blogs, posts and comments everywhere. So you have to
filter out the relevant information yourself. That includes the magazines etc.
as they tend to exaggerate their statements to get more attention too.
Look at the wisdom written on the left
In
the very early stages (like where I am now) you can read everything and pick
out what to take from that. Let’s use examples:
“Great!”
“Love it” “Wow!”
Nice
for encouragement and motivation. Might want to say thanks… ;)
“I
don’t like your voice and your face is just a balloon with hair on it.”
Ignore
this. And don’t mistakes comments like that for statements about your singing
skills.
“The
song is great but your guitar sound sucks.”
As
long as you use decent equipment (e.g. interface + free amp sims by LePou+IRs)
and just dialed in a tone to your liking dismiss this. If you’re using a Fuzz
Pedal into the mic in of your computer you might want to check your setup.
Those ‘mixed’ comments which include pros and cons might contain important
information especially if a positive general statement is followed by
criticizing a specific element. But it could also be a matter of taste.
Definitely investigate.
“The
bass is boring”
This
is one of the more difficult ones and it would help a lot if you had background
information about the person posting this. There are not enough insults to be
meant as trolling/hate comment but barely more than that. Is it about the
sound, about what is played, the whole song or a part? If it’s the only comment
- or if it bothers you enough - you can try to investigate the background
either by asking or by checking the profile. If the person coincidentally plays
the criticized instrument part it’s highly likely that this comment is
somewhere in between of “if I played this song I’ve done something different”
and “I know the instrument way better than you”. And what to take away from
that heavily depends on what the comment was about. If you just implemented the
said instrument for this one song to add a little more color to the overall
sound it’s pretty pointless to think about it long. If it’s a reoccurring basic
instrument (like bass) you should investigate if you didn’t cut back on this
part on purpose to make room for something else.
“Long
and constructive criticism”
Although
it should be obvious that if someone takes the time to write a long text and
even suggests something you should at least answer “thanks I’ll look into it” I
suggest you really check the stuff pointed out and address it in an answer.
Some things you might do on purpose and it would be good if people knew that.
Other things you never thought about and those are really moments to thank the
person for pointing out.
The
more people you’ll reach the more comments you’ll get and the more you’ll need
to filter. And then it’s still another balance to keep: where does “accepting
foreign ideas” stop and “humoring critics” begin? In the beginning you want to
find your own style later on you want to evolve. And there’ll always be people
who first write stuff like “new/refreshing but needs a little more finesse” and
later “lost track, forgot own roots”. So in the end it’s – like most of the
time – up to you and your goals. Do you just want to express yourself and be
happy with the responses you get? Do you want to appeal to the masses? Bend the
border of the genre you’re into?
At
the moment I focus on establishing DrScythe and improve my mixing skills. So I
read everything but sort out most of the comments on songwriting and style. As
I release one song per month and only I know that the next one will be
completely different it doesn’t make a lot of sense to listen to stuff about
these topics by now. Also I want to achieve better mixes but not in terms of
‘modern, loudness to the max’-style. I don’t have to care about radio stations
and my songs not jumping into the faces of listeners. I just want everything to
be ‘glued together’ and besides that to sound like I want it. I really don’t
like ultra-modern sounds like extremely gated kick drums, buzzsaw electric
guitars and everything just running into a limiter until it’s a squished and
stirred acoustic mess.
I
am consciously taking the risk of people disliking it just because of that
right now. But I started my project because I wanted to hear my songs coming to
life and the sound is part of that. This doesn’t mean that I am completely
happy with the mixes of the released tracks so far…
So
long
DrScythe
PS:
I left out one critical point on purpose. Genres. There’ll always be people who
just stumble across your work (e.g. in your attempt to promote it) and who have
no idea about what you’re doing. And this stretches to things far beyond music.
Ask street photographers and nature photographers (esp. with a focus on
animals) about equipment and approach to their hobby.
If
you enjoy my music and want to annoy some friends I now just got the thing for
you: a channel trailer!
Sorry for this entry being a little confusing and loose - my grandfather died when I was just past the half of the text and I said to myself: well finish it and...wasn't a good idea it seems.
Today’s
blog is about the elemental balance between fun and seriousness. Personally I’d
say there are three overall categories:
Pure
fun; no real ambitions at all, just playing an instrument (and drink lots of
e.g. beer), extremely rare gigs, might even be difficult to play with fellow
musicians, being skilled takes a lot more talent due to lack of time spent with
practicing
Hobby
but with results (gigs/records): probably largest group, enthusiastic beginner
to seasoned semipro, balancing between work, life and hobby is a problem, might
even make some money
Pro:
keeping the fun might be difficult until you reach the highest spheres,
technically two subgroups: studied musicians and those who had their very own
combination of luck/skill/time/connections/etc. to become a pro
I
recently realized that the balance between having fun and getting some results
can be a problem especially if it’s not your fault that whatever you’re trying
to produce isn’t finished by a certain date. At the moment I am almost anxious before
I record vocals as my neighbors tend to…well…ruin the takes. Hammering,
drilling, screaming, REALLY LOUD CONVERSATIONS right in front of the door,
vacuuming…staying motivated to wait for 10 minutes of silence and having fun in
exact that moment isn’t quite what you want when following your passion. But
you still want to finish your work and begin thinking about why you’re doing
this.
That’s
when I noticed that I am taking my hobby way more seriously than ever before –
and also had more fun than ever before. In my case it’s almost like a dream
come true to finally hear some of those songs finished and even receiving
positive feedback. And there are some
songs left that are even more important to me.
This
doesn’t mean that everybody should take making music more seriously. But maybe
think about it once in a while. Especially when I thought about the musicians I
met on the way I noticed that some were way too earnest about it and some
seemed to have no motivation beyond playing their instrument. As long as you’re
a band of hobbyists I highly doubt it’s useful to demand perfect instrumental
skills or plan every gig for three years in advance and calculate possible
fans. On the other hand you can’t expect your band mates to tolerate you
failing to play a song you all agreed on over and over again be it an original
or a cover. So if you want to get somewhere you’ve got to put some work into
it.
Which
means you need to do stuff that isn’t quite fun to have more fun later or find
the fun in work. Of course if it is your passion it won’t always feel like work
to you but others might see it as work and at some point you’ll run into
something you can’t avoid to make progress that isn’t fun even to you. This
might be quite early on your way (I realized that I won’t ever find motivation
to practice enough to shred after half a year) or later. What’s always on the
line then is where you’re going from there. Find your motivation to go through
with it? Look for something else to improve? Look for a way around it? Or give
up altogether and never move on again?
With
some parts of the process of writing, recording and mixing my songs becoming
some sort of routine I have to say that it’s really exciting to focus on the
creative parts. Not only while writing it but also during the mixing phase.
Deciding whether it should sound more compact or sort of spacey, dry or full of
effects…per track and overall. On the first two songs I was definitely way more
focused on balancing everything out which I now find quite easy as some tricks
already found their ways into my memory.
So…I
hope I was able to explain what I wanted to say…if not, please comment, then I’ll
try to descramble my brain a little…so long